Saturday, January 10, 2015
Sunday, December 14, 2014
GVEA projects $21 million principal payment on debt and additional loans and other financing of $94 million.
Big chunk of change. You can read the details starting on page 18 of the member book located here.
Thursday, December 04, 2014
There are two major components to consumption: Utility charge and energy charge.
The utility charge is everything not related to the cost of energy, such as operations, administration, legal, interest, depreciation and payment on loans, distribution and transmission costs.
Energy charge is everything that is related to the cost of energy. It was formerly known as COPA - the cost of power adjustment and meant to allow a utility to change their rates based upon the fluctuating cost of energy (oil, gas, coal, etc.) What is allowed to be included is set by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska. For example, some years ago GVEA asked that the cost of ash disposal from the Healy coal fired power plant be allowed to be included in the COPA (the RCA said yes). More recently, GVEA had asked to include the cost of building Eva Creek wind farm in COPA, as there is no energy charge from wind. GVEA withdrew that request after realizing that the RCA wouldn't rule on it in time for it to be of financial advantage to GVEA.
Both rates are initially set after a rate study, which GVEA only does when there is a major shift in the numbers, such as inclusion of a new power plant. Such studies cost over a million dollars so not to be done lightly.
The utility charge is allowed to be changed in the interim every 6 months through a SRF (simplified rate filing) to the RCA, but not more than 8% in a year. The energy charge can be changed quarterly and is subject to this complex formula.
In addition to these two charges, there is a fixed customer charge for the cost of having a meter, regardless of whether you use electricity or not and then a very minor regulatory charge to compensate the RCA for overseeing the public interest of utilities,
If you are a large commercial or industrial customer, you will have a lower utility rate, but then also have a demand charge, based upon your peak consumption for the past 12 months. GVEA talks about all these charges on their website. They do have a handy bill calculator as well. It would be interesting to have a table like below that would go back further.
So here is the last 4 years of rates by month.
|Dec-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.09947||$0.20288|
|Nov-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.10378||$0.20719|
|Oct-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.10378||$0.20719|
|Sep-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.10378||$0.20719|
|Aug-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.10593||$0.20934|
|Jul-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.10593||$0.20934|
|Jun-14||$ 0.10341||$ 0.10593||$0.20934|
|May-14||$ 0.10001||$ 0.09496||$0.19497|
|Apr-14||$ 0.10001||$ 0.09496||$0.19497|
|Mar-14||$ 0.10001||$ 0.09496||$0.19497|
|Feb-14||$ 0.10001||$ 0.09631||$0.19632|
|Jan-14||$ 0.10001||$ 0.09631||$0.19632|
|Dec-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.09631||$0.19355|
|Nov-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.10576||$0.20300|
|Oct-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.10576||$0.20300|
|Sep-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.10576||$0.20300|
|Aug-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.08774||$0.18498|
|Jul-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.08774||$0.18498|
|Jun-13||$ 0.09724||$ 0.08774||$0.18498|
|May-13||$ 0.09597||$ 0.11078||$0.20675|
|Apr-13||$ 0.09597||$ 0.11078||$0.20675|
|Mar-13||$ 0.09597||$ 0.11078||$0.20675|
|Feb-13||$ 0.09597||$ 0.10802||$0.20399|
|Jan-13||$ 0.09597||$ 0.10802||$0.20399|
|Dec-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.10802||$0.19806|
|Nov-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.13768||$0.22772|
|Oct-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.13768||$0.22772|
|Sep-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.13768||$0.22772|
|Aug-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12379||$0.21383|
|Jul-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12379||$0.21383|
|Jun-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12379||$0.21383|
|May-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12527||$0.21531|
|Apr-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12527||$0.21531|
|Mar-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12527||$0.21531|
|Feb-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12737||$0.21741|
|Jan-12||$ 0.09004||$ 0.12737||$0.21741|
|Dec-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.12737||$0.21528|
|Nov-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.10924||$0.19715|
|Oct-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.10924||$0.19715|
|Sep-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.10924||$0.19715|
|Aug-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.10943||$0.19734|
|Jul-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.10943||$0.19734|
|Jun-11||$ 0.08791||$ 0.10943||$0.19734|
|May-11||$ 0.08337||$ 0.10051||$0.18388|
|Apr-11||$ 0.08337||$ 0.10051||$0.18388|
|Mar-11||$ 0.08337||$ 0.10051||$0.18388|
|Feb-11||$ 0.08337||$ 0.08929||$0.17266|
|Jan-11||$ 0.08337||$ 0.08929||$0.17266|
|Dec-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.08929||$0.17266|
|Nov-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09137||$0.17474|
|Oct-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09137||$0.17474|
|Sep-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09137||$0.17474|
|Aug-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09401||$0.17738|
|Jul-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09401||$0.17738|
|Jun-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09401||$0.17738|
|May-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09890||$0.18227|
|Apr-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09890||$0.18227|
|Mar-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09890||$0.18227|
|Feb-10||$ 0.08337||$ 0.09886||$0.18223|
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Readers may recall reading about the various $900 million in recommended transmission improvements in a report from the Alaska Energy Authority. It didn't include proposed trucked natural gas in its projections, but is still draft.
And with all the spare capacity in the railbelt, there doesn't appear to be any crying need for Susitna.
So many moving parts.
Monday, September 15, 2014
Our supply is: Baseload resources
Load following (i.e. flexible on/off and capacity adjusting)
The look above, once we have Healy 2 on line, is that except in the deep winter, we won't be taking much natural gas from Anchorage as it runs about the same price as Healy 2 is expected to.
All this being said, there are other reasons to have a notification system.
One of the challenges and opportunities is that GVEA's contact info on members is way out of date, especially as far as cell phones and email. This would be an opportunity to get updated. Perhaps this could be a MAC job?
GVEA might consider an inexpensive notification system such as FNSB Air Quality Dept is now rolling out (3rd party alertmedia.com , a Nixle like service) with an in-house Google form to sign up. Notifications could be for a variety of reasons: outages, price signaling, board and annual membership meetings, RCA hearings, etc.
I was told that GVEA is anticipating spending $300,000 in a future budget to upgrade their outage notification system with lots of bells and whistles. Maybe this is way too much? As it is now, it appears that Facebook offers more information about outages in progress than any other form of communication.
So we will see where this goes.
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Friday, June 06, 2014
Saturday, May 10, 2014
People around town have commented on the lack of quorum for the recent annual meeting. I don't see this on the agenda, but perhaps it will be discussed under board member comments.
Thursday, May 01, 2014
It seems to many that the elimination of the registration bonus $15 in 2013 was the most likely culprit. It was also an attempt to save money on the production of the meeting, costing about $18,000 last year. GVEA wisely announced this in advance to avoid unhappy people in the line and it would appear that their marketing effort was successful in a perverse way. Even with reduced number of cookies and no fruit-vegetable platters, there were trays full of cookies left over. Here's board Chairman Bill Nordmark at the leftover table following the meeting.
If reduced attendance is expected to continue, it might be considered to have it in a smaller and more affordable venue next year. The meeting used to be held at Hering Auditorium.
In a positive vein, the reduced attendance meant that the odds of winning the 9 drawings for $250, $500, and $1,000 were up. Two next-door-neighbors on Chena Hot Springs Road each won one.
The meeting was not video'd this year as in the past few years, but meeting audio and the Powerpoint presentation was promised to be on line soon.
A final thought is that it is important for members to be involved in their co-op, thus show up. Member feedback in the past couple years was to do away with the frills of the annual meeting production and concentrate on business. I think this goal was accomplished. That being said, it appears that carrots are still needed to garner a quorum.
Monday, April 28, 2014
With investments of over $320 million prior to this, I believe this might be the most expensive coal fired power plant for the 50 mw it is intended to produce. Here is No comments:
Sunday, April 27, 2014
The summary of the report says:
The recommended transmission system improves reliability, mitigates future cost increases to Railbelt rate payers, allows unconstrained energy transfers and the use of peaking capacity from the Bradley Lake hydroelectric project, provides improved and increased energy transfers between all areas of the Railbelt, and facilitates the addition of the Watana large hydro project.